🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities is set to be cut by more than half, after a divisive legislative amendment that required municipal councils to submit the future of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include multiple councillors based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to elect a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, local governments were only able to create a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a public vote in their region. Local populations often devoted considerable time building community backing and urging their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to put it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, stating local residents should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing many regions against guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a vital step in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties however have criticised the new policy as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to policies designed to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has said it aims to end “ethnic-specific” approaches, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – most cities mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to create other types of wards – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards indicated the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that chose to retain their wards.