Protecting Kyiv's Architectural Legacy: An Urban Center Rebuilding Its Foundations Under the Threat of War.
Lesia Danylenko beamed with pride as she displayed her newly installed front door. Local helpers had given the moniker its elegant transom window the “crescent roll”, a playful reference to its bowed shape. “Personally, I believe it’s more of a showy bird,” she stated, admiring its twig-detailed features. The renovation effort at one of Kyiv’s pre-World War I art nouveau houses was supported by residents, who marked the occasion with two lively pavement parties.
It was also an act of resistance in the face of an invading force, she elaborated: “Our aim is to live like normal people in spite of the war. It’s about shaping our life in the most positive way. We have no fear of remaining in our homeland. I could have left, moving away to a foreign land. On the contrary, I’m here. The new entrance symbolizes our allegiance to our homeland.”
“We strive to live like normal people in spite of the war. It’s about organizing our life in the most positive way.”
Protecting Kyiv’s built legacy could be considered strange at a moment when aerial assaults frequently hit the capital, resulting in death and destruction. Since the onset of the current year, bombing campaigns have been notably increased. After each attack, workers cover blown-out windows with plywood and endeavor, where possible, to save residential buildings.
Among the Explosions, a Campaign for Identity
Despite the violence, a group of activists has been striving to conserve the city’s decaying mansions, built in a whimsical style known as Ukrainian modernism. Danylenko’s house is in the historic Shevchenkivskyi district. It was constructed in 1906 and was first the home of a prosperous fur dealer. Its outer walls is decorated with horse chestnut leaves and delicate camomile flowers.
“These structures stand as symbols of Kyiv. These properties are quite rare in the present day,” Danylenko said. The building was designed by a designer of Central European origin. Several other buildings in the vicinity exhibit similar art nouveau features, including an irregular shape – with a medieval spire on one side and a turret on the other. One popular house in the area boasts two forlorn white stucco cats, as well as owls, masks and a demonic figure.
Dual Dangers to Heritage
But external attacks is only one threat. Preservation campaigners say they face unprincipled developers who raze protected buildings, unethical officials and a administrative body apathetic or hostile to the city’s rich architectural history. The severe winter climate adds another burden.
“Kyiv is a city where money wins. We are missing genuine political will to save our heritage,” said Dmytro Perov, an activist. He asserted the city’s mayor was allied with many of the developers who destroy important houses. Perov further alleged that the vision for the capital harks back to a bygone era. The mayor rejects these claims, attributing them from political rivals.
Perov said many of the civically minded activists who once defended older properties were now engaged in combat or had been fallen. The lengthy conflict meant that the entire society was facing monetary strain, he added, including judicial figures who curiously ruled in favour of suspect new-build schemes. “The longer this persists the more we see deterioration of our society and state bodies,” he argued.
Loss and Abandonment
One notorious demolition site is in the historic Podil neighbourhood. The street was lined with classical 19th-century houses. A developer who purchased the plot had pledged to preserve its attractive brick facade. In the immediate aftermath of the full-scale invasion, excavators demolished it. Recently, a crane prepared foundations for a new retail and office development, watched by a unfriendly security guard.
Anatolii Pohorily, a heritage supporter, said there was not much hope for the remaining coloured houses on the site. Sometimes developers levelled old properties while claiming they were doing “scientific study”, he said. A 20th-century empire also inflicted immense damage on the capital, redesigning its primary street after the second world war so it could facilitate official processions.
Continuing the Work
One of Kyiv’s most notable champions of historic buildings, a cultural activist, was killed in 2022 while engaged in a contested area. His colleague Nelli Chudna said she and other volunteers were carrying on his vital preservation work. There were initially 3,500 masonry mansions in Kyiv, many built for the city’s wealthy entrepreneurs. Only 80 of their original doors remain, she said.
“It was not external attacks that destroyed them. It was us,” she lamented. “The war could go on for another 20 years. If we don’t defend architecture now little will be left,” she added. Chudna recently helped to restore a full of character ivy-draped house built in 1910, which serves as the headquarters of her cultural organization and also serves as a film set and museum. The property has a new vermilion portal and period-correct railings; inside is a vintage sanitary facility and antique mirrors.
“The war could continue for another 20 years. If we fail to protect architecture now nothing will be left.”
The building’s resident, artist Yurii Pikul, described his home as “quite special and a little bit cold”. Why do many locals not appreciate the past? “Regrettably they are without education and taste. It’s all about business. We are striving as a country to move towards the west. But we are still some distance away from civilization,” he said. Outdated ways of thinking lingered, with people unwilling to take personal responsibility for their urban environment, he added.
Hope in Restoration
Some buildings are crumbling because of official neglect. Chudna pointed to a once-magical villa concealed behind a modern hospital. Its roof had caved in; pigeons made their home among its smashed windows; rubbish lay under a storybook tower. “Frequently we lose the battle,” she admitted. “Preservation work is a form of healing for us. We are trying to save all this history and aesthetic value.”
In the face of war and development pressures, these volunteers continue their work, one facade at a time, arguing that to save a city’s heart, you must first cherish its stones.