🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters applauding your insights on expanding your business? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your posts appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I persisted, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where the same posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."